This article discusses the negative connotations that surround the term “second victim,” which is used to describe healthcare providers following their involvement in a adverse medical incident. Authors of this article persuade people to stop using this term, since it discourages healthcare providers from taking responsibility for their actions, as well as undermines the patient’s feelings and situation.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is the lead Federal agency charged with improving the safety and quality of America’s health care system. AHRQ develops the knowledge, tools, and data needed to improve the health care system and help Americans, health care professionals, and policymakers make informed health decisions.

Incident reporting is the most common method used to promote patient safety in healthcare settings. This method requires those involved in the event go complete an incident form, which is a detailed summary of the occurrence. There are key components that make incident reporting systems effective and successful. To be successful, the incidence form should be submitted in a timely manner and be disseminated among an array of healthcare professionals.

Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation describes what federally funded programs have accomplished in understanding medical errors and implementing programs to improve patient safety over the last five years. This compendium is sponsored jointly by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Department of Defense (DoD)-Health Affairs. The 140 articles in the 4-volume set cover a wide range of research paradigms, clinical settings, and patient populations. Where the research is complete, the findings are presented; where the research is still in process, the articles report on its progress. In addition to articles with a research and methodological focus, the compendium includes articles that address implementation issues or present useful tools and products that can be used to improve patient safety.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHQR) developed the CANDOR (Communication and Optimal Resolution) Event Checklist, which is a guide to be used by the CANDOR team after an adverse event occurred in the healthcare setting. The checklist includes effective ways of reporting, assessing, investigating, and analyzing the adverse event to decrease the likelihood of future incidents occurring, as well as improving the overall quality of patient care and safety.

The CANDOR Event Review Report Template is a guide used to analyze and investigate barriers that contributed to an adverse health event. Barriers include poor communication behaviors, unsafe physical environment, inadequate care, and equipment device failure. This template also includes a guide to assess who was responsible for the adverse event, and ways to develop solutions for it so it.

The Communication and Optimal Resolution (CANDOR) process is used  by health care institutions and practitioners to respond in a timely, thorough, and just way when unexpected events cause patient harm. The CANDOR toolkit contains eight different modules, which contain PowerPoint slides with facilitator notes, tools, resources, or videos. Examples of modules include “Care for the Caregiver” and “Organizational Learning and Stability.” These modules focus on effective ways to reduce patient harm and increase overall healthcare quality and safety through family and patient engagement, as well as specific ways to decrease the risk of future adverse outcomes.

The Guide to Patient and Family Engagement in Hospital Quality and Safety was developed by the for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to encourage patient and family involvement in healthcare quality and safety. This guide includes four key methods as follows:

• Encourage patients and family members to participate as advisers.
• Promote better communication among patients, family members, and health care professionals from the point of admission.
• Implement safe continuity of care by keeping the patient and family informed through nurse bedside change-of-shift reports.
• Engage patients and families in discharge planning throughout the hospital stay.

Read how the AMA pursues medical liability laws on the state level to reshape the current medical liability system to better serve both physicians and patients.

“Annie’s Story” is an example of how healthcare organizations seeking high reliability embrace a just culture in all they do. This includes a system’s approach to analyzing near misses and harm events—looking to analyze events without the knee-jerk blame and shame approach of old. This video specifically focused on Nurse Andrea’s personal experience with an adverse health event with a patient who underwent a hypoglycemic emergency due to a misreading of a glucometer. The video then details the steps she and the hospital took to prevent future adverse health events, as well as other ways to increase overall patient safety and quality.

The Apology and Disclosure Grand Rounds NWH incorporates a video simulated error and a presentation about “When Things Go Wrong”. The presentation discusses disclosure coaching & peer support, the emotional impact of errors on clinicians, and principles for transparent & compassionate disclosure and apology.

Medical errors are associated with significant emotional, financial, physical and sociobehavioural impacts including reduced trust and willingness to seek healthcare. These impacts can last for years. The study sought to understand whether greater open communication is associated with reduced emotional impacts and decreased avoidance of doctors/facilities involved in the error.

Background: The emotional impact of medical errors on patients may be long-lasting. Factors associated with prolonged emotional impacts are poorly understood.

Methods: The authors conducted a subanalysis of a 2017 survey (response rate 36.8% [2,536/6,891]) of US adults to assess emotional impact of medical error. Patients reporting a medical error were included if the error occurred ≥ 1 year prior. Duration of emotional impact was categorized into no/short-term impact (impact lasting < 1 month), prolonged impact (> 1 month), and especially prolonged impact (> 1 year). Based on their reported experience with communication about the error, patients’ experience was categorized as consistent with national disclosure guidelines, contrary to guidelines, mixed, or neither. Multinomial regression was used to examine associations between patient factors, event characteristics, and organizational communication with prolonged emotional impact (> 1 month, > 1 year).

Results: Of all survey respondents, 17.8% (451/2,536) reported an error occurring ≥ 1 year prior. Of these, 51.2% (231/451) reported prolonged/especially prolonged emotional impact (30.8% prolonged, 20.4% especially prolonged). Factors associated with prolonged emotional impact included female gender (adjusted odds ratio 2.1 [95% confidence interval 1.5–2.9]); low socioeconomic status (SES; 1.7 [1.1–2.7]); physical impact (7.3 [4.3–12.3]); no organizational disclosure and no patient/family error reporting (1.5 [1.03–2.3]); communication contrary to guidelines (4.0 [2.1–7.5]); and mixed communication (2.2 [1.3–3.7]). The same factors were significantly associated with especially prolonged emotional impact (female, 1.7 [1.2–2.5]; low SES, 2.2 [1.3–3.6]; physical impact, 6.8 [3.8–12.5]; no disclosure/reporting, 1.9 [1.2–3.2]; communication contrary to guidelines, 4.6 [2.2–9.4]; mixed communication, 2.1 [1.1–3.9]).

Conclusion: Prolonged emotional impact affected more than half of Americans self-reporting a medical error. Organizational failure to communicate according to disclosure guidelines after patient-perceived errors may exacerbate harm, particularly for patients at risk of health care disparities.

This article explains the challenge of balancing accountability and a “no blame” model in healthcare systems when promoting patient safety. Accountability is defined as taking responsibility for one’s actions. In this article, it is taking responsibility for malpractice that increases patient harm. the “no blame” model is defined as not accusing a single entity for any healthcare misconduct. It is important for healthcare systems to embody both taking responsibility for healthcare malpractices as well as the “no blame” model to effectively promote patient safety and quality and reduce adverse health events.

Resources for patients and families in need of information and support after a medical error or adverse medical event.

Resources for clinicians and staff looking for data and information about the importance of support after adverse medical events, or for administrators that are interested in implementing a peer support program at their institution.

Webinar Date: January 21, 2021

Wesley R. Butler discusses the role of confidentiality and privilege within the context of Communication and Resolution Programs.

Presenter: Wesley R. Butler is an attorney at Barnett Benvenuti & Butler PLLC in Lexington Kentucky who focuses on advising health care providers on regulatory matters that implicate safety, quality, and reimbursement.

Objectives: 

• Outline the elements of typical confidentiality and privilege interests in patient safety and quality analyses, and explore the public policies that support such interests
• Outline the fundamental components of common CRP processes in health care, and explore the public policies and ethical considerations that support CRPs for responding to patient harm events
• Analyze the interplay between CRPs and confidentiality and privilege interests to identify complementary and divergent points
• Conclude with practical suggestions to illustrate that health care providers can fully implement CRP processes while respecting the boundaries of confidentiality and privilege and,  ultimately, gain the benefits that both perspectives offer

Webinar Date: April 26, 2022

Moderator

• Caitlin Harrington. MD, JD

Speaker Panel

• Jeffrey N. Catalano, JD
• Jeff Goldenberg, MD
• Naomi Kirtner
• Jo Shapiro, MD, FACS

Webinar Date: February, 2021

Overview: COVID-19 has fundamentally altered our care processes and standards.  Care is being delayed, visits are happening by telemedicine, there are changes in how staff are deployed and interact with patients, and everyone is exhausted and emotionally depleted. These all make potential for patient harm events higher.  COVID-19 is also adding stress to already tightening medical professional liability insurance market. While it may be tempting to abandon ship when it comes to implementing CRP during COVID-19 times, CRPs are more important now than ever.  Fundamental principles of the CRP model-supporting patients, families, and clinicians after harm with open communication, empathy, learning, and accountability – are critical elements of how we respond to COVID-related harm events.  This webinar examines two cases of COVID-associated adverse events to help lead a discussion on the challenging aspects in implementing CRPs during this time.

Presenters: Michelle Mello, JD, PhD, and Thomas H. Gallagher, MD

Commentary by: Jeffrey Catalano, JD, Marcia Rhodes, Jonathan Steward, JD, MS, RN-BC, CEN, CPHRM

Learning Objectives: 

• Examine potential communication and legal issues associated with COVID-related harm events
• Describe how CRPs can be used as a strategy to address these COVID-related adverse events
• Learn about CRP resources to help address COVID-related challenges

Webinar Date: June 24, 2021

Presenters:

Objectives:

Webinar Date: September 23, 2021

Presenters: 

• Alan Lembitz, MD, MMM, Chief Medical Officer, COPIC
• Eric Wei, MD, MBA Senior Vice President and Chief Quality Officer, NYC Health + Hospitals
• Laurie C. Drill-Mellum, MD, MPH, Chief Medical Officer, Constellation

Learning Objectives:

• Understand the importance of physician involvement in the CRP process and how it helps both physicians and patients
• Examine the benefits of CRPs to physicians
• Explore the barriers to CRP implementation from a provider’s perspective
• Learn why psychological safety a critical component of provider support

Webinar Date: June 17, 2021

Presenters: Jonathan D. Stewart, JD, MS, RN-BC, CPHRM

Jonathan is a Senior Director of Risk Management and Patient Safety at BETA Healthcare Group, where he serves as a consultant to hospitals, health care facilities and medical groups. His current professional focus includes helping health care organizations operationalize communication and resolution programs, particularly the investigation and analysis of patient harm events.

Objectives:

• Identify conflicting notions of success and failure regarding CRPs
• Discuss the relationship between incomplete CRP implementation and irregular application of CRPs
• Describe lessons learned from unsuccessful applications of CRPs to individual events

Webinar Date: March 17, 2022

Moderator

• Caitlin Harrington. MD, JD

Speakers

• Dr. Jeff Goldenberg and Naomi Kirtner, co-founders of Talia’s Voice

Webinar Date: October 21,2021

Moderator

• Carole Hemmelgarn, MS, MS

Speaker Panel

• Jack and Teresa Gentry
• Naomi Kirtner and Jeff Goldenberg, MD

Learning Objectives

• Understand what elements are important for patients and families to hear after medical harm
• Compare and contrast patient experiences with and without a Communication and Resolution Program (CRP) following harm
• Explain the importance of a highly reliable CRP for patients and families

Webinar Date: October 12, 2022

Presenter: WilliamM.  Sage, MD, JD

William M. Sage, MD, JD, an authority on health law and policy, is a tenured professor in Texas A&M’s medical and law schools, a professor by courtesy in the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M, and a vice president in the university’s Health Science Center.   From 2006-2022, he held professorships in law and medicine at the University of Texas at Austin, where he also served as vice provost for health affairs.  He was previously a tenured professor at Columbia Law School, and has been a visiting professor at Yale, Harvard and NYU.  Prof. Sage is a member of the National Academy of Medicine, where he serves on the Board on Health Care Services and recently served on the Committee on the Future of Nursing 2020-2030.  Prof. Sage is a member of the Healthcare System and Value Research (HSVR) study section for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), an elected Fellow of the Hastings Center on bioethics, and a longtime editorial board member of the journal Health Affairs.  He has written over 200 articles and has authored or edited four books, including the Oxford Handbook of U.S. Health Law (2016).  He holds an undergraduate degree from Harvard College, medical and law degrees from Stanford University, and an honorary doctorate from Universite Paris Descartes.

Webinar Date: July 15, 2021

Presenters: 

• Jo Shapiro, MD, FACS, Associate professor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Harvard Medical School; Principle Faculty for the Center for Medical Simulation in Boston; Consultant for the Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Anesthesia, Pain and Critical Care
• Allan Frankel, MD, Chief Executive Officer, Safe & Reliable Healthcare

Learning Objectives:

• Identify conflicting notions of success and failure regarding CRPs
• Discuss the relationship between incomplete CRP implementation and irregular application of CRPs
• Describe lessons learned from unsuccessful applications of CRPs to individual events

Webinar Date: July 21, 2022

Presenters: Kyle Sweet, JD

Kyle Sweet is an Oklahoma-based defense lawyer represents healthcare providers in catastrophic injury cases around the United States. Kyle teaches in medical schools, dental schools and teaches seminars regularly to healthcare providers on how to avoid litigation by improving quality of care through more effective communication. Kyle is proud to serve on the CAI and looks forward to helping make Communication Resolution Programs the industry standard.

Webinar Date: December 17, 2020

Presenter: Julianne Morath, RN, MS, CPPS, Founding member of the Lucian Leape Institute of the National Patient Safety Foundation

Objectives:

1.  Define the term precondition and its relevance to Transparency

2. Identify at least two reasons to embrace transparency

3. Identify at least three levels of transparency

4. Demonstrate an understanding of why being transparent is so difficult

Webinar Date: April 15, 2021

Presenters:

• Suz Schrandt, JD,  Senior Patient Engagement Advisor, Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine; Founder, CEO, & Chief Patient Advocate at ExPPect
• Eric J. Thomas, MD, MPH Associate Dean for Healthcare Quality, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Board President, Collaborative for Accountability and Improvement

Objectives:

• Understand the individual and system factors that can cause diagnostic errors
• Explore the benefits of a CRP response following a diagnostic error
• Examine the consequences of a poor response to a diagnostic error
• Understand the importance of engaging, listening, and learning from patients and families following diagnostic errors

Webinar Date: October 22, 2020

Dr. Urmimala Sarkar discusses healthcare disparities and specific challenges to adverse event communication among diverse populations within the CANDOR process.

Presenter: Urmimala Sarkar MD, MPH, Professor of Medicine at UCSF in the Division of General Internal Medicine, Associate Director of the UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, and primary care physician at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital’s Richard H. Fine People’s Clinic

Objectives: 

• Examine disparities in healthcare and which populations are more likely to experience lower quality healthcare and adverse events
• Delineate how low-income, limited literacy, racially/ethnically diverse populations may experience the response to adverse events differently
• Characterize specific challenges for adverse event communication among diverse populations
• Identify best practices from lived experience among risk management professionals for communicating across differences in the aftermath of adverse events