The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is the lead Federal agency charged with improving the safety and quality of America’s health care system. AHRQ develops the knowledge, tools, and data needed to improve the health care system and help Americans, health care professionals, and policymakers make informed health decisions.

39 states have apology laws, with over a third applying to healthcare or other contexts. After over a decade of experience with apology laws, the authors explore whether apology laws reduce malpractice liability risk and why, and whether there is a reason to have them.

Webinar Date: September 15, 2022

Presenters: Melinda B. Van Niel, MBA, CPHRM

Melinda B. Van Niel, M.B.A., C.P.H.R.M., has been working to help resolve adverse events through Communication Apology and Resolution (CARe) for ten years. She is the Director of CARe programs at the Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety in Massachusetts (formerly MACRMI) leading its implementation team, and consults on CARe implementation for institutions across the country. In the past she worked as the Manager of Patient Safety at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the department Healthcare Quality where she helped build one of the first CARe programs in the state, and was a contributor and advisor to the AHRQ’s CANDOR Toolkit. Ms. Van Niel received her Bachelor of Arts degree from Harvard University and her Master’s in Business Administration from Villanova University with a concentration in healthcare management.

Webinar Date: January 26, 2022 Lauge Sokol-Hessner, MD, CPPS

Presenters: Lauge Sokol-Hessner, MD, CPPS

Lauge Sokol-Hessner, MD, CPPS is a hospitalist, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Washington, QI Mentor at the UW Medicine Center for Scholarship in Patient Care Quality and Safety, speaker and consultant for the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, and a guest speaker for the Harvard Medical School Masters in Healthcare Quality and Safety (HMS MHQS). He has experience in operational quality & safety, developing leaders in quality & safety, teaching communication skills, coaching health care organizations to implement highly-reliable CRP programs, and he champions patient and family engagement, ethics, humanism, equity, and respect in health care. He completed medical school and residency at the University of Pennsylvania.

WEBINAR DATE: July 16, 2020

This webinar outlines the concerns and questions about the collision between the judicial system and its pathway to addressing medical error and CRP programs.

PRESENTERS: Cindy Jacobs, RN, JD

OBJECTIVES:

1. Describe the basics of how the tort system operates in a medical error/adverse outcome situations
2. Describe the basics and how, when, and why CRP “apology laws,” “mandatory disclosure” laws/requirements, and healthcare licensing systems intersect and/or collide with the tort system
3. Identify key points to assist healthcare professionals in navigating intersections and collisions

This article explains how healthcare providers and insurers were skeptical of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Communication (AHQR) Communication and Optimal Resolution (CANDOR) toolkit, which is a guide for healthcare providers to use if there was patient injury. Healthcare providers and insurers are weary of the CANDOR toolkit, since it does not quickly fix litigation scandals. This toolkit also does not effectively identify patient safety risks. However, the CANDOR toolkit is an effective step for healthcare providers to take in being honest and transparent with their patients about any malpractice or increased risk of injury.

This is the website for the Washington Patient Safety Coalition’s (WPSC) Communication and Resolution Certification Program. When healthcare providers and organizations have utilized a CRP following an adverse event, they can apply for “CRP Certification.” A neutral group of patient safety experts and patient advocates has been convened to review responses to adverse events and certify whether the patient’s needs have been met, any individual or system-level inadequacies have been addressed, and learning has occurred. The certification process provides valuable feedback to healthcare organizations and demonstrates that they achieved all the essentials of a CRP.

The Washington Patient Safety Coalition is a program of the Foundation for Health Care Quality (The Foundation). The Foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing a trusted, independent, third party resource to all participants in the health care community – including patients, providers, payers, employers, government agencies, and public health professionals.

The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) and the National Patient Safety Foundation (NPSF) started collaborating together to utilize its combined resources and knowledge to further  patient safety efforts and create safety systems in various healthcare settings.

The Policy Committee works to educate and engage various groups on how to support CRP at the institutional, state, and federal level. This past year, the committee reached out to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) and to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

The letter to NPDB is part of a continued conversation about efforts to expand alternatives to medical liability litigation.

The letter to CMS illustrates how CRPs are consistent with the principles of Person and Family Engagement.